From the Velocity Asymmetry Report

Where Does Your Team Stand

Seven questions, answerable in one meeting. Each "no" indicates an area where the asymmetry is currently unmanaged.

Read the full report: The Velocity Asymmetry →

Read the full report: The Velocity Asymmetry →

The seven questions, in full

The seven questions below can be answered in a single meeting. Each "no" indicates an area where the asymmetry is currently unmanaged.

  1. Definition. Can you state, in machine-readable form, what "reliable enough" means for your five most critical services?
  2. Verdict. When a service degrades at 2 a.m., does the on-call engineer see a single healthy-or-not verdict in seconds, before consulting a dashboard?
  3. Budget. Do release and rollback decisions rely on error budget as a matter of routine?
  4. Coverage. Are SLOs defined for a new service in the same pull request that moves it to production?
  5. Time. Has every objective been reviewed since the service it describes last materially changed?
  6. Ownership. Does every objective have a named owner who would notice if it went stale?
  7. Machine access. Can an AI agent query reliability state before acting on production, through an interface built for programs?

Scoring

0–2 yes

Zero to two yes answers means reliability is reactive and incidents are the discovery mechanism.

3–5 yes

Three to five means the contract exists in places, and drift and coverage gaps are the risk.

6–7 yes

Six or seven means judgment scales with the system and autonomy can widen safely.

From The Velocity Asymmetry, the Nobl9 report on AI-era reliability.

Explore the Sandbox
Get a feel for the platform
no account, no configuration needed.